OCTAVE VS MATLAB CODE
My question is the following: why should it be the case that vectorized code also runs more slowly in Octave? It seems that in this case memory should be set aside before the loop and some native C/C++ loop should perform the operation, which would equate performance between Octave and MATLAB for vectorized code. It was written in C, C++ and Fortran Language. It was written in C, C++ and Java programming language. Octave is programming language used for numerical computations.
This makes sense, and the largest performance differences appear to occur in these cases (e.g Mathworks Matlab vs Gnu Octave) MATLAB is a matrix laboratory, referred to as language used for technical computations. The consensus also seems to suggest that most of MATLAB's performance boost is attributable to its JIT compiler, which compiles large loops at runtime. I've read a number of posts/other sources comparing performance of Octave and MATLAB, and I've run some of my own tests on standard scripts that confirm the general consensus that Octave is generally much slower than MATLAB for standard operations (iterated, of course, so that the comparison is meaningful). This means that a developer who developed a code in Octave can't run the same on MATLAB. Matlab and Octave languages are both considered to be similar in many fields because they both are high-level programming language, which is used in the field of computerization such as matrix calculation as well as in algorithms. This question Why/when should I prefer MATLAB over Octave?) answered several, but there is still one lingering. Answer (1 of 2): GNU Octave is similar to MATLAB, but the syntax differs. I have been using Octave and MATLAB for a few projects, and I've come across a few questions.
0 kommentar(er)
